Thursday, November 4, 2021 - Carson City - Full Court
FED. HOUS. FIN. AGENCY VS. DIST. CT. (WESTLAND LIBERTY VILLAGE, LLC)
Docket Number: 82666
Carson City - 10:00 A.M. - Full Court
This is an original petition for a writ of prohibition from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”), in its capacity as Conservator for the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), seeking to dissolve a preliminary injunction order from the district court that enjoined FHFA. This writ petition results from a district court decision between Fannie Mae and Westland Liberty Village, LLC and Westland Village Associates, LLC (“Westland”), in which FHFA sought to intervene in the proceedings after the district court issued the preliminary injunction order. After this writ petition was filed, the district court allowed FHFA to intervene in the original case, and then denied FHFA’s motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction in early August 2021. The related case between Fannie Mae (and Grandbridge Real Estate Capital, LLC) and Westland, in which Fannie Mae also seeks to dissolve the preliminary injunction and additionally challenges the district court’s denial of appointment of receiver, remains before this court on appeal in Docket No: 82174.
ISSUES:
ISSUES: In this writ petition, FHFA argues that the district court exceeded its’ jurisdiction under both federal and state laws in issuing the preliminary injunction and seeks a writ of prohibition to dissolve the injunction.
Disclaimer:
This synopsis is intended to provide only general information about this case before the Nevada Supreme Court. It is not intended to be all-inclusive or reflect all positions of the parties. To access the documents that have been filed in this matter, type the docket number into the court’s case search page: https://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/public/caseSearch.do
SENA (CHRISTOPHER) VS. STATE
Docket Number: 79036
Carson City - 11:30 A.M. - Full Court
After a 17-day jury trial, appellant was convicted on 95 of 120 counts, including child abuse and neglect, sexual abuse, lewdness, possession of child pornography, and incest related to his sexual interactions with his children and other family members that occurred over a matter of years. Appellant was sentenced to serve concurrent and consecutive prison terms totaling 327 years and 4 months to life in the aggregate.
ISSUES:
ISSUES: (1) Did the State file certain charges outside the applicable statutes of limitations; (2) Did the State present insufficient evidence of guilt for charges 1, 115, 116, 118, and 119; (3) Are NRS 200.700(4) and NRS 200.710(2) constitutional (4) Whether appellant’s convictions violate his due process right against multiple convictions for the same offense; (5) Whether appellant’s convictions violate the double jeopardy clause; and (6) Did the courtroom entrance and exit rules violate appellant’s state and federal constitutional right to a public trial?
Disclaimer:
This synopsis is intended to provide only general information about this case before the Nevada Supreme Court. It is not intended to be all-inclusive or reflect all positions of the parties. To access the documents that have been filed in this matter, type the docket number into the court’s case search page: https://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/public/caseSearch.do